by Jamie Pantastico | Dec 31, 2025 | Israel and Bible Prophecy |
Key Thesis:
Gentiles are partakers of the root—God never replaced the root.
Introduction: Where the Divide Becomes Clear
There are many theological disagreements within Christendom, but only a few expose the heart of what someone truly believes about God.
Romans 11 is one of them.
This chapter does not allow for ambiguity. It does not tolerate theological gymnastics. It draws a clear, immovable line in the sand—between those who believe God keeps His promises and those who believe He revises them.
Since October 7, 2023, that line has become visible to the naked eye. What had once been academic disagreement has turned into open hostility toward Israel and toward believers who affirm God’s covenant faithfulness.
Romans 11 explains why.
Paul’s Question That Ends the Debate
Paul begins Romans 11 with a question that should have ended the discussion forever:
“I say then, has God cast away His people? Certainly not!”
— Romans 11:1
The Greek here is as strong as it gets.
God forbid.
May it never be.
Absolutely not.
Paul does not hesitate. He does not qualify his statement. He does not leave room for reinterpretation.
God has not cast away His people Israel.
Any theology that says otherwise is not a harmless difference of opinion—it is a direct contradiction of Scripture.
Israel’s Blindness Is Real — and It Is God’s Doing
Paul goes even further, revealing something deeply unsettling to human pride:
“For God has committed them all to disobedience, that He might have mercy on all.”
— Romans 11:32
This is where many readers grow uncomfortable.
Who committed Israel to disobedience?
God did.
Not Israel alone.
Not Rome.
Not the Church.
Not Satan.
God Himself temporarily blinded Israel so that grace could flow freely to the Gentiles.
That means Israel’s current condition is not evidence of God’s rejection—it is evidence of God’s sovereign mercy.
And that brings us to the root.
The Olive Tree: The Image That Ends Replacement Theology
Paul introduces an image that cannot be harmonized with replacement theology:
“And if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive tree, were grafted in among them, and with them became a partaker of the root and fatness of the olive tree…”
— Romans 11:17
Notice what Paul does not say.
He does not say the tree was uprooted.
He does not say a new tree replaced it.
He does not say Israel ceased to be the root.
Instead, he says Gentiles were grafted in.
“Do not boast against the branches… remember that you do not support the root, but the root supports you.”
— Romans 11:18
This is the line in the sand.
Gentiles are partakers of the root—God never replaced the root.
If the root remains, Israel remains.
If Israel remains, God remains faithful.
If God remains faithful to Israel, grace remains secure for the Church.
Pull up the root, and everything collapses.
Temporary Setting Aside Is Not Permanent Rejection
Paul anticipates Gentile arrogance and stops it cold:
“Blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in.”
— Romans 11:25
Two words matter here:
Israel’s blindness is partial, not total.
It is temporary, not permanent.
And when the “until” expires, God will resume His prophetic dealings with His covenant people.
Paul states the outcome plainly:
“And so all Israel will be saved.”
— Romans 11:26
Not symbolically.
Not spiritually redefined.
Not absorbed into the Church.
Israel.
Why Romans 11 Exposes Hearts
Romans 11 forces a decision.
Either:
- God can temporarily set Israel aside without breaking His promises
Or:
- God must cancel His covenants to keep theology tidy
There is no middle ground.
That is why Romans 11 is avoided, reinterpreted, spiritualized, or ignored.
Because Romans 11:
- Destroys replacement theology
- Protects justification by grace
- Exposes pride in the Church
- Vindicates the faithfulness of God
The Irrevocable Line
Paul concludes with a statement that should silence every accusation against Israel:
“For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.”
— Romans 11:29
Irrevocable means:
- Not withdrawn
- Not revised
- Not reassigned
- Not spiritualized away
If God’s calling of Israel can be revoked, then grace itself becomes conditional.
And if grace becomes conditional, it is no longer grace.
Why This Matters Now
The rage we are witnessing toward Israel—and toward believers who stand with God’s Word—is not political at its core.
It is theological.
Romans 11 exposes:
- Whether someone believes God keeps His Word
- Whether Paul’s teaching still governs the Church
- Whether grace is truly grace
That is why this chapter has become the fault line.
Conclusion: The Line Has Been Drawn
Romans 11 does not ask for permission.
It does not bend to modern pressure.
It does not apologize.
It declares:
- God has not cast away Israel
- Gentiles are grafted in, not substituted
- Israel’s blindness is temporary
- God’s covenants stand
- God’s mercy is on full display
Gentiles are partakers of the root—God never replaced the root.
And that is why Romans 11 is the line in the sand.
“Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God!”
— Romans 11:33
by Jamie Pantastico | Dec 29, 2025 | Verse-by-Verse Bible Studies |
📖 Passage Breakdown — Romans 12:16
“Be of the same mind toward one another. Do not set your mind on high things, but associate with the humble. Do not be wise in your own opinion.”
📜 Background, Setting & Purpose
✍️ Author
Paul the Apostle, writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
👥 Written To
Believers in Rome — a mixed body of Jew and Gentile believers living in a hostile, fractured world.
⏲️ When
~A.D. 57, near the close of Paul’s third missionary journey.
🌍 Setting & Purpose of Romans (book-level)
Romans is first doctrinal (chapters 1–11), then practical (chapters 12–16).
Romans 12 marks a major transition:
- From doctrine → daily living
- From justification → transformed conduct
- From what God has done → how believers now walk
Paul is not explaining how to be saved here.
He is explaining how saved people live.
📖 Immediate Context (Romans 12)
Romans 12 describes life that flows from grace:
- Living sacrifices (v.1)
- Renewed minds (v.2)
- Humility in service (vv.3–8)
- Love without hypocrisy (vv.9–21)
Verse 16 addresses how believers view and treat others.
✨ Phrase-by-Phrase Breakdown
“Be of the same mind toward one another.”
This is a call to impartiality, not uniform personality.
“Same mind” does not mean:
- Everyone must think identically
- Agreement on every opinion
- Forced conformity
It means:
- Equal regard
- Shared humility
- Mutual concern
- No favoritism
Paul is addressing attitude, not intellect.
“Do not set your mind on high things…”
This is a warning against:
- Status-seeking
- Superiority
- Social hierarchy
- Spiritual elitism
“High things” refers to:
- Pride of position
- Association for advantage
- Measuring worth by appearance or achievement
This is the opposite of grace-thinking.
“…but associate with the humble.”
Grace moves toward people, not above them.
This phrase means:
- Do not avoid those of low status
- Do not distance yourself from the hurting
- Do not choose relationships based on benefit
Christ Himself modeled this perfectly (Phil 2:5–8).
“Do not be wise in your own opinion.”
This is a direct assault on self-righteous judgment.
To be “wise in your own opinion” is to assume:
- You see clearly
- You understand others fully
- Your conclusions are final
Paul knows something we often forget:
we never know the full story of another person’s life.
❌ What This Verse Does Not Mean
- Not that believers must approve of sin
- Not that truth should be compromised
- Not that discernment is forbidden
- Not that moral distinctions disappear
Paul is addressing posture, not doctrine.
✅ What It Does Mean
- Believers are never to view themselves as superior
- Grace eliminates grounds for judgmentalism
- Fellowship is based on shared mercy, not shared status
- Pride has no place among people saved by grace
- The gospel levels everyone
No one stands above another at the foot of the cross.
🔗 Cross-References for Going Deeper
Philippians 2:3–5 — Esteem others better than yourself
James 2:1 — No partiality in the faith
1 Corinthians 4:7 — What do you have that you did not receive?
Romans 14:4 — Who are you to judge another’s servant?
Ephesians 4:2 — Lowliness, gentleness, longsuffering
🙏 Devotional Reflection — Grace in a World in Free-Fall
The world is already fractured, hostile, and overwhelmed. The last thing it needs is believers who come across as superior, dismissive, or high-minded.
Romans 12:16 reminds us of something essential: we are not called to judge people—we are called to love them. We never know what someone is carrying, what losses they’ve endured, or what battles they’re fighting. Grace does not stand over people; grace comes alongside them.
Christ died for all. That truth alone removes every excuse for pride.
As believers, we are always to seek the highest good of the other person, regardless of their status, background, or condition. The ground is level at the cross. And when we live that way, the gospel is not just proclaimed—it is seen.
Bottom Line
Romans 12:16 is grace lived out.
Saved people do not look down—they reach out.
by Jamie Pantastico | Dec 29, 2025 | Israel and Bible Prophecy |
Did Dispensationalism Come from a Basement in the 1800s? A Biblical Response
In recent months, accusations have intensified against believers who affirm God’s covenant faithfulness to Israel. One of the most common claims is that so-called “Christian Zionism” or dispensational theology was “created in someone’s basement in the 1800s,” often attributed to C. I. Scofield.
That claim is repeated frequently.
It is also historically false and theologically evasive.
Scofield Did Not Create Dispensational Truth
- C.I. Scofield did not invent the distinction between Israel and the Church. He did not create dispensations, nor did he originate the belief that God will fulfill His promises to Israel.
Scofield compiled and systematized biblical distinctions already present in Scripture—particularly those revealed through the Apostle Paul.
If later clarification invalidates doctrine, then:
- The Trinity collapses
- Justification by faith alone becomes suspect
- The canon of Scripture itself becomes questionable
Truth is not determined by when it is articulated, but by whether it is biblical.
The Israel–Church Distinction Comes from Paul, Not Scofield
The real issue is not Scofield.
The issue is Romans 9–11.
Paul explicitly teaches:
- God has not cast away His people (Romans 11:1)
- Israel’s blindness is partial and temporary (Romans 11:25)
- Israel’s fall brought salvation to the Gentiles (Romans 11:11)
- Israel’s calling is irrevocable (Romans 11:29)
- God Himself committed Israel to disobedience so He might have mercy on all (Romans 11:32)
Rejecting Israel’s future is not rejecting Scofield.
It is rejecting Paul.
Blaming Bible-Believing Christians for Middle Eastern Christian Decline Is False
The decline of Christian communities in the Middle East is tragic—but it did not begin with American evangelicals or dispensational theology.
Middle Eastern Christians have suffered for centuries under:
- Islamic domination
- Dhimmi systems
- Civil wars
- Islamist extremism
- Economic collapse and emigration
Blaming believers who affirm God’s covenant faithfulness is not analysis—it is scapegoating.
Christianity is not preserved by geography.
The Church is not territorial.
Our citizenship is in heaven (Philippians 3:20).
Supporting Israel Is Theological— Not Political
Affirming God’s promises to Israel does not mean endorsing every action of a modern secular government.
Biblical support for Israel is rooted in:
- Covenant
- Scripture
- God’s character
Not nationalism.
Not politics.
Not ideology.
The Real Issue
This debate is not ultimately about politics or Palestine.
It is about whether:
- God keeps His promises
- Romans 11 means what it says
- Paul’s teaching still matters
That is why Scripture is often avoided.
That is why Scofield is attacked.
That is why accusations replace exegesis.
“For God has committed them all to disobedience, that He might have mercy on all.”
— Romans 11:32
That truth did not come from a basement.
It came from the risen Lord, revealed through the Apostle Paul.
Footnotes
- Distinctions between Israel and the Church appear explicitly in Romans 9–11 and Ephesians 3
- Early church fathers debated Israel’s role long before Scofield
- The Reformers recovered soteriology, not eschatology
- Doctrinal development ≠ doctrinal invention
by Jamie Pantastico | Dec 27, 2025 | Verse-by-Verse Bible Studies |
📖 Passage Breakdown — Amos 3:3
“Can two walk together, unless they are agreed?”
📬 Reader Request:
This Passage Breakdown was requested by Sam R, from Tustin, California who recently asked about Amos 3:3.
His question was about application today? The answer is in this post. I’m grateful for every question that helps shape this series.
This series reaches thousands of people around the world daily. Praise God.
📜 Background, Setting & Purpose
✍️ Author
Amos, a shepherd and fig farmer from Tekoa, called by God to prophesy.
👥 Written To
The northern kingdom of Israel (often called Ephraim), during a time of prosperity, moral decay, and spiritual rebellion.
⏲️ When
Approximately 760–750 B.C., during the reign of Jeroboam II, before the Assyrian captivity.
🌍 Setting & Purpose of Amos (book-level)
Amos is a book of divine confrontation.
God sends Amos to declare:
- Israel’s covenant unfaithfulness
- God’s coming judgment
- The certainty of divine accountability
- That privilege does not cancel responsibility
Amos is not written to Gentiles. It is for our learning!
It is not written to the Church.
It is written to God’s covenant nation under the Mosaic Law.
📖 Chapter 3 Focus
Amos 3 explains why judgment is coming.
God explains that His actions are not random, harsh, or unjust. They are the result of broken agreement between Himself and Israel.
Amos 3:3 is the foundational principle for everything that follows.
✨ Phrase-by-Phrase Breakdown
“Can two walk together…”
“Walk” in Scripture often refers to:
- Conduct
- Fellowship
- Relationship
- Shared direction
This is not about a casual encounter.
It describes an ongoing journey together.
In context, the “two” are:
This is covenant language.
“…unless they are agreed?”
“Agreed” means:
- To meet by appointment
- To be in harmony
- To share terms
- To walk on the same basis
God had clearly established the terms of His relationship with Israel through the Mosaic Covenant.
Blessing was promised for obedience.
Judgment was promised for disobedience.
Israel broke the agreement.
God did not.
The question is rhetorical.
The implied answer is no.
❌ What This Verse Does Not Mean
- Not a general proverb about friendship.
- Not a reminder to “find like-minded people.”
- Not a Church-Age instruction about Christian unity.
- Not a verse teaching ecumenism or compromise.
While it contains a principle that can be applied carefully, its primary meaning is covenantal, not devotional.
✅ What It Does Mean
- God does not act arbitrarily.
- Judgment follows broken agreement.
- Israel cannot expect covenant blessings while rejecting covenant terms.
- God’s prophets are warning Israel before judgment falls.
- Separation has already occurred because agreement was abandoned.
Amos 3:3 explains why God must now act.
🔗 Immediate Context (Amos 3:1–8)
- v.1 — Israel singled out as uniquely accountable
- v.2 — “You only have I known… therefore I will punish you”
- v.4–6 — A series of cause-and-effect illustrations
- v.7 — God reveals His plans to the prophets
- v.8 — The prophet must speak
Amos 3:3 is the starting axiom:
No agreement → no fellowship → judgment follows.
🔗 Cross-References for Going Deeper
Leviticus 26 — Covenant blessings and curses
Deuteronomy 28 — Terms of agreement
Isaiah 1:2–4 — Israel’s rebellion
Hosea 6:7 — Covenant transgression
2 Corinthians 6:14 — Principle applied carefully, not imported
🙏 Devotional Summary
Amos 3:3 reminds us that God is a God of clarity, not confusion. Fellowship with Him has always been based on agreement with what He has revealed. For Israel, that agreement was the Law. When the covenant was broken, fellowship was disrupted—and judgment followed. God’s question is not cruel; it is honest. Relationship with God has never been on human terms, but on His. When agreement is restored, fellowship follows. When it is rejected, separation is inevitable.
Bottom Line
Amos 3:3 is not about coexistence—it is about covenant faithfulness.
God does not change the terms.
He honors what He has revealed.
by Jamie Pantastico | Dec 25, 2025 | Devotionals |
🎄Christmas According to the Apostle Paul
Key Text: Galatians 4:4–5
“But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption as sons.”
Devotional: The Purpose of His Birth
This is Paul’s only direct reference to the birth of Christ — and it is anything but sentimental.
Paul does not speak of shepherds or angels.
He does not mention a manger or a star.
He tells us why Christ was born.
Christmas, according to Paul, is not about atmosphere.
It is about timing, incarnation, law, resurrection, redemption, and adoption (our position).
“When the Fullness of the Time Had Come…” — God’s Perfect Timing
Christmas did not happen randomly.
It happened at the precise moment God had ordained — after:
- the promise in Genesis 3:15
- the covenants with Abraham and David
- centuries under the Law
- the silence between the Testaments
Every prophecy, covenant, and historical movement converged at one point in history.
Christmas declares that God is never early, never late — always exact.
“God Sent Forth His Son…” — The Eternal Son
Paul does not say God created His Son.
He says God sent Him.
This confirms what the series has shown all along:
- the Son existed before Bethlehem
- the Son is eternal
- the Son willingly entered time
The One born in Bethlehem is the same One “from everlasting” (Micah 5:2).
“Born of a Woman…” — Fully Human
Here is Genesis 3:15 in Paul’s words.
The Seed of the woman had arrived.
Jesus was truly human — not an appearance, not a myth, not a spirit.
He entered the world the same way every human does — through birth.
This qualified Him to represent humanity.
“Born Under the Law…” — Fully Accountable
This phrase is crucial.
Christ was not born outside the Law.
He was born under it.
That means:
- He submitted to it
- He obeyed it perfectly
- He fulfilled it completely
He did what no son of Adam ever could.
Christmas places Jesus inside humanity’s problem, not above it.
“To Redeem Those Who Were Under the Law…” — The Mission
This is the heart of Christmas.
Jesus was not born merely to teach.
Not merely to inspire.
Not merely to model obedience.
He was born to redeem.
To buy back.
To pay in full.
To satisfy the demands of the Law.
To satisfy the will of the Father.
The manger points forward to the cross.
“That We Might Receive the Adoption as Sons” — The Result
Redemption was not the end goal — relationship was.
Because Christ fulfilled the Law and paid sin’s penalty for all mankind, God has opened the door of heaven and is now pouring out His grace on all—Jew and Gentile alike, with no distinction—in the form of a free 🎁gift: salvation apart from the Law, received simply by believing (faith alone) the gospel—”good news” of Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection:
- we are no longer slaves
- we are no longer condemned
- we are no longer outsiders
We are sons.
Christmas ends not with fear, but with family.
Encouragement for this Christmas Day
Galatians 4:4–5 reminds us that Christmas is not about what we feel —
it is about what God accomplished.
The birth of Christ means:
- sin has been addressed
- the Law has been fulfilled
- redemption has been secured
- adoption has been granted
If Christ was born exactly as promised,
and died exactly as required,
then every promise that remains will also be fulfilled.
Final Reading Plan
- Genesis 3:15 — The promise of the Seed
- Isaiah 53 — The purpose of the suffering
- Luke 2:1–20 — The birth itself
- Galatians 4:4–5 — The meaning of Christmas
- Revelation 19:11–16 — The return of the King
Closing Thought
Christmas is the moment God stepped into history to rescue those trapped under sin and the Law.
Born of a woman.
Born under the Law.
Sent to redeem.
Raised to adopt. (Resurrection Power)
That is Christmas.
And that is the gospel.
← Previous | 📖 Series Home |