A simple question that collapses a popular tradition

 

There is one response you will hear again and again whenever someone points out the clear distinctions between Peter’s preaching and Paul’s gospel.

 

They will say it with confidence—almost with irritation—as if it ends the discussion:

 

“Peter and Paul preached the same gospel. Salvation has always been the same.”

 

And I agree with one part of that statement:
 

all salvation—from Abel to the end of time—is only possible because of the finished work of the cross: the death, shed blood, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

 

But where this cliché goes off the rails is when people try to force Paul’s gospel backwards into the Gospels and early Acts—pretending that Peter and the Twelve were already preaching what Paul later defines plainly in 1 Corinthians 15:1–4.

 

So let me ask a question that no amount of tradition can escape:

 

If Peter and the other apostles were preaching Paul’s gospel… why weren’t they waiting outside the tomb?

 

Paul’s Gospel Is Clear

 

Paul defines the saving gospel in unmistakable terms:

 

“Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel… by which also you are saved…
that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,
and that He was buried,
and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures.”
— 1 Corinthians 15:1–4

 

That is Paul’s gospel.
It is specific. It is precise. It is finished-work gospel truth.

 

Now—here comes the simplest point in the world:

 

If the apostles had been preaching this gospel for three years…

 

Why Wasn’t Peter Waiting Outside the Tomb?

 

If the disciples truly understood that Christ would:

 

• die 
• be buried 
• and rise again the third day 

…then the morning of the third day should have been the most anticipated event in human history.

 

Yet what do we see?

 

• No apostles waiting at the tomb 
• No crowd gathered in expectation 
• No celebration ready to explode across Jerusalem 
• No disciples saying, “Today is the day!” 

 

Instead, we see the opposite.

 

When Mary goes to the tomb, she isn’t going there expecting resurrection—she goes expecting death.

 

Why?

 

Because she is going to anoint the body.

 

If Mary Knew Paul’s Gospel… Why Was She Bringing Spices?

 

Think about it.

 

If Mary believed Christ would rise again the third day, then why would she go there to anoint a corpse?

 

She wasn’t going to witness resurrection.
She was going to care for a dead body.

 

That tells you everything you need to know.

 

If the Apostles Knew Paul’s Gospel… Why Did They Not Believe the Reports?

 

Even when told of the resurrection, Scripture says they did not believe.

 

The reason is obvious:

 

They did not know.

 

And God tells you that plainly.

 

Jesus Told Them—Yet God Says It Was Hidden From Them

 

This is the verse that should end the debate for anyone willing to believe Scripture:

 

“Then He took the twelve aside and said to them, ‘Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of Man will be accomplished. For He will be delivered to the Gentiles and will be mocked and insulted and spit upon. They will scourge Him and kill Him. And the third day He will rise again.’
But they understood none of these things; this saying was hidden from them, and they did not know the things which were spoken.”

— Luke 18:31–34

 

Read that again:

 

• they understood none of these things 
• it was hidden from them 
• they did not know 

 

That is not theological interpretation—that is the Holy Spirit’s own commentary.

So no, they were not preaching Paul’s gospel.

They couldn’t preach what God had not revealed.

 

Peter Didn’t Say “Let’s Go to the Tomb”… He Said “I Go Fishing”

 

And after the crucifixion and resurrection appearances, what does Peter say?

 

“Simon Peter said to them, ‘I am going fishing.’”
— John 21:3

 

If Peter had the gospel of death, burial, and resurrection clear in his mind—if he had been preaching it as the saving message—he would not have said, “I go fishing.”

 

He would have said:

 

“We go proclaim the finished work.”

 

But that wasn’t his message.

 

So What Were They Preaching?

 

They were preaching this:

 

Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.

 

That is exactly what Peter confessed:

 

“You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
— Matthew 16:16

 

That is the kingdom gospel message:
Israel’s Messiah is here.

 

And Acts makes it clear what scope that message had.

 

Acts 11:19 Proves the Audience Was Still “Jews Only”

 

Here is the verse modern Christendom ignores because it destroys the narrative:

 

“Now those who were scattered after the persecution that arose over Stephen traveled as far as Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to no one but the Jews only.”
— Acts 11:19

 

That is crystal clear.

 

After Pentecost… after Acts 2… after Acts 3…
they were still preaching the Word to Jews only.

 

So how can anyone claim the Body of Christ (Jew/Gentile equality) began at Pentecost?

 

How can anyone claim Paul’s gospel was already being preached?

 

They can’t—unless they twist Scripture.

 

The Bottom Line

 

This isn’t complicated.

 

If Peter preached Paul’s gospel, then:

 

• the apostles would have been waiting at the tomb 
• Mary wouldn’t have gone to anoint a dead body 
• there would have been crowds expecting resurrection 
• the disciples would not have been shocked and unbelieving 
• Luke 18 would not say it was hidden 
• Acts 11:19 would not say “Jews only” 
• Acts 15 and Galatians 2 wouldn’t even exist 

 

But Scripture says what it says.

 

God hid it. They did not know. Therefore they could not have preached Paul’s gospel.

 

Paul’s gospel was revealed later—through Paul—exactly as Paul himself testifies:

 

• hidden 
• not made known 
• revealed to him 
• committed to him 

 

And once you see it, you can’t unsee it.